These are exactly, what the moderators are. They have the privilege of deleting unfitting translations and should - ideally - stand in touch with each other to discuss translations made.
1 Like
Explain to me. What is meant? Payment for a flight made on a medium-sized liner (per ticket for a passenger), or is it a payment for a certain period for all flights on medium-sized liners (the number that appears in the expense report)?
Hmm, I don’t recall seeing these exact words in the game. I’m assuming it’s the payment received when turnaround is completed, but I’m not sure.
But is there really a moderator for every language? I thought there are only a handful of moderators for removing spam and inappropriate content.
1 Like
What is “Baggage path analyzer”? I mean - Baggage Scanner?
Explain to the blunt, what is it ?! How can baggage be disposed of incorrectly? According to my logic, the luggage is either disposed of or not. There is a prescribed disposal procedure, after which an act is drawn up. Or what, the luggage was traveling on the belt to the utilizer, and on the way fell off the belt and fell apart, then it was collected from the floor and shoved into the utilizer by hands? What the hell is this?
I have not seen in the game that there was any procedure for incorrect disposal of baggage.
Apparently it is necessary to finish reading all the last Dev blog to the end.
And who is the moderator in the Russian localizer?
Dangerous baggage has to be routed to a baggage destroyer. If your security officers make a mistake, they will send safe baggage to the destroyer, increasing the value of incorrectly destroyed baggage. Have you not tried building a conveyor belt system yet?
1 Like
I installed the conveyor belt system with all the scanners, and the first, second, and third level, and the shredder too. Everything works, the luggage is rolling.
That’s it! It means that there is baggage that is legal, but destroyed by mistake, and it is " ", and there is baggage that was destroyed correctly, because there is really something forbidden in it, and it is " "???
And I wonder why I am always fined $ 5,000 for some kind of dangerous bags on board, although only the largest and most complete inspection and scanning systems are installed on the access system.
I correctly understood that all passengers and luggage are checked, and in spite of this, what percentage of bags / luggage, by default, will either be on board in the status - dangerous, or will go to the shredder by mistake?
Yes, that’s how the destroyer works.
If you are receiving $5000 fines, it must mean that your security officers are accidentally approving dangerous baggage. There are two possible reasons:
- They have a low skill
- They are not rested and need to use the toilet
1 Like
All employees have skills in the green zone and employees of this type are recruited in abundance.In a blog about the airport in Plumont, I saw 2 level 3 scanners in the conveyor system. It was explained to me that this reduces the percentage of errors in baggage distribution. You know something about it?
Well in case the first person makes a mistake, the second one can correct it. This reduces the chance of dangerous bagagge being loaded.
In theory, yes. But is such an implementation spelled out at the level of the code in the game, that two scanners reduce the % of errors?
No, it’s just that when more people have to approve something, there is a lower chance of failure. The amount of incorrectly scanned baggage is not computed as whole, every single bag is randomly scanned correctly or incorrectly (this is influenced by staff skill).
Suppose that all employees of this type are as trained as possible, it turns out that the result will be the same, if employees on both scanners have the same qualifications, then there is no reason in the second second scanner. Did I understand correctly that each, separate scanner of the same type has a different% of hazard detection for the same bag, with the same qualifications of employees?
Sorry, that’s not what I meant. The scanners are the same, it is only influenced by employee productivity. If the employee is fully trained and rested, there is no need for a second scanner. However, when the employee becomes tired, he/she might make a mistake. That’s why having a second scanner can fix the mistake (if the employee on the second scanner is fully productive)
By the way, we kind of went off topic. If you have more questions, maybe you should post them in #support.
1 Like
Friends! Help is needed! How do abbreviations stand for - FW : , ATC, : N / A?
FW: I assume is “Foward” (from an email)
ATC: Air traffic control
N/A: Not applicable
2 Likes
Can you tell me where or when these strings appear?
“Hangar” - will appear in Alpha 36, for setting the aircraft for repair, “stand” - small stand, medium stand, large stand, the place where the aircraft stands after landing and taxiing. “lounge” - in the international zone, if I imagine correctly …
2 Likes
I need to understand the variable {0} what it refers to … @Alexander