Service road built with Stand......why?

[humoresque]

Can I just ask wich one is the main one?

Removing the service roads on stands?

Or keep the stands with service roads attached, but have them identify existing service roads when placing a stand so the service road on the stand can be placed over/directly on top of an existing service road

Overlap service roads on remote stands

Overlap service roads on remote stand I think it would be a good idea for the service roads to be able to overlap/join on remote stands. Right now if you want to place two remote stands with the backs against each other you will automatically have two 2-lane service roads, so four lanes in total. This is completely unnecessary and looks awkward.

Service road built with Stand......why?

I’d like to see them like the de-ice pads, where it shows where the service road connections must be. For stands, that connection could be the same place as now (on the terminal side only) to not require any or much change to on-stand pathing. But it would allow a single service road to service remote stands on both sides, or even one way service roads, or single lane service roads. Ideally I’d like to see the ability to connect either on terminal side or Apron side - maybe with connector node…